Socially Stable Strategies?
Am reading Freakonomics... and of course, I'm not convinced :)
The essential point of freakonomics so far (3 chapters down) seems to be that somehow economics has the tools for the answers to pretty strange questions. Like, what's common between sumo wrestlers and high school teachers? And then there is some reasoning about this and that and some clever way of getting actual data and doing some clever analysis.
[pic credits: freakonomics.com]
But why economics?? Some of the things, like selling bagels or selling crack in Chicago a few decades ago does have a clear economic angle. Others, like sumo wrestlers have a less clear (at first pass) economic angle, and some (dating) have very little.
So what's the correct generalization here?
Socially Stable Strategies - SSS
A truism:Nothing in Biology makes sense except in the light of evolution -(Theodosius Dobzhansky [bah! the Dictionary cannot spellcheck this]).Some of the recent literature has started looking towards biology for ideas about why we make the 'economic' choices we do.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home